- Joined
- Apr 7, 2026
- Messages
- 10
Is it true we have to backstock the counts of eaches in each casestock
I have just been backstocking cases without figuring out the number of eaches inside since it’s a small number and the squinty 6 looks like 9 upside down or even 8 from far enough away and when flipped. The pick computer printing the barcode running at the distribution center already seems to know the count of eaches in cases that we’re depositing into casestock, so if we just deposited one casepack into a designated casestock area a computer should be able to trivially figure out the count based on the computerized case label and number of cases, and entering the number of eaches in each case feels like monkey behavior in this age. I don’t know why the people that run this corporation decided on one of the least efficient backstocking processes that isn’t even idiot proof, it’s actually ridiculously error prone and probably costs them loads due to human error
Please discuss and argue with me in the comments I am currently looking for attention
I have just been backstocking cases without figuring out the number of eaches inside since it’s a small number and the squinty 6 looks like 9 upside down or even 8 from far enough away and when flipped. The pick computer printing the barcode running at the distribution center already seems to know the count of eaches in cases that we’re depositing into casestock, so if we just deposited one casepack into a designated casestock area a computer should be able to trivially figure out the count based on the computerized case label and number of cases, and entering the number of eaches in each case feels like monkey behavior in this age. I don’t know why the people that run this corporation decided on one of the least efficient backstocking processes that isn’t even idiot proof, it’s actually ridiculously error prone and probably costs them loads due to human error
Please discuss and argue with me in the comments I am currently looking for attention
Last edited:
