OneArmedJesus
Entertainment DBO
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2018
- Messages
- 1,166
Here is a photo of the Dress Code straight from the TM Handbook:
View attachment 5985
It is worrisome that some other Cali stores' HR Teams are saying things like, "no black pants." Nobody on my current HR team would ever dare to say "khaki pants only" during orientation. Target actually has a document that tells all California and Washington store HR Teams that there is to be no retaliation against anybody who chooses not to wear khaki. Leaders and HR must adhere to this no retaliation policy. Target is serious about not wanting to get sued in these two states.
Each store in California is supposed to have a Compliance board/wall in a section that is visible to all employees in the store. There is information about rights, minimum wage, worker's compensation, dress code, etc. For dress code, it is a poster with photos and text that literally says that it is ok to wear any "solid colored pants (preferably khaki)". Any CA store that doesn't have all of that information posted would fail the compliance portion during an HR audit by HQ.
Ever wear khaki pants during a heavy period?Why does California care enough about dress codes to have a law?
On another note, can a TM wear their black "new and only at" T-shirt on any given day w/o any red shirt or cardigan. It has the Target logo.
My store goes with "If Target gave you the shirt, you can wear it on shift any day, regardless of color". I have that shirt, and wear it all the time. Nobody cares.No. It is only to be worn during launches.
No. It is only to be worn during launches.
I don't know what to tell you. Somebody pointed out that section of the handbook in my last orientation and asked about wearing black pants, and HR said no, that's not acceptable, and you must wear khaki. That may be illegal, but so is half the shit my store pulls.Here is a photo of the Dress Code straight from the TM Handbook:
View attachment 5985
It is worrisome that some other Cali stores' HR Teams are saying things like, "no black pants." Nobody on my current HR team would ever dare to say "khaki pants only" during orientation. Target actually has a document that tells all California and Washington store HR Teams that there is to be no retaliation against anybody who chooses not to wear khaki. Leaders and HR must adhere to this no retaliation policy. Target is serious about not wanting to get sued in these two states.
Break out last year's black friday t-shirt. PARTY!!My store goes with "If Target gave you the shirt, you can wear it on shift any day, regardless of color". I have that shirt, and wear it all the time. Nobody cares.
I don't know what to tell you. Somebody pointed out that section of the handbook in my last orientation and asked about wearing black pants, and HR said no, that's not acceptable, and you must wear khaki. That may be illegal, but so is half the shit my store pulls.
Every time it gets taken down, reprint and post it with double the font size.Like I said, someone needs to post the dress code and the Cali laws in the Break Room on a regular basis until they stop that shit.
I don't know what to tell you. Somebody pointed out that section of the handbook in my last orientation and asked about wearing black pants, and HR said no, that's not acceptable, and you must wear khaki. That may be illegal, but so is half the shit my store pulls.
Because CA has a law about everything.Why does California care enough about dress codes to have a law?
Sometimes there's no choice. Pants that fit my butt don't fit anywhere else and threaten to fall off when I take a step, and a belt bunches things up to a ridiculous and uncomfortable level (think the elastic cord that tightens the mouth of a bag). Pants that fit everywhere else are going to be super tight in the butt. Apparently clothing manufacturers have decided that fat women are all stomach and flat butt.We can wear capris any time, and everyone who does is reasonable about it so no one's spoiled that. Some on flow wear shorts before the store opens. And skin tight? Sure, although I've never seen the logic behind wearing skin-tight in a job where a lot of bending is required, and I'd just as soon not see all those rolls and bulges made visible by such tight clothing.