They didn't look at our TL they looked at me. "Why didn't I say anything?"
Because we're not TLs. Its as simple as that. They're not going to give me TL responsibilities, and pay me the same amount as someone who is seasonal. I may know Flexible Fulfillment like the back of my hand, but I'm not responsible for someone else's metrics. You hired them? Then coach them. Last time I've checked, thats a Lead's duty. You can't expect a TM to do that for you. Not going to happen.
Life don't work that way. I got bills to pay, and the increase of $$$ may make the responsibilities more bearable.
The idea is that typically pack productivity is way more red than pick. They’re worried more about productivity than INFs apparently
I think its more to it than that.
Sure, packing productivity may be more red. Thats because of poor scheduling and your only packer leaving SFS to grab some OPUs that had 30 minute time windows (my store). Lets not forget that corporate wanted to chop that down to 15 minutes (looking at you, pilot stores that went through it).
My best guess is that they want those "fulfillment experts that worked in last Q4" category, to teach pack'n'ship 2.0 on whats the best way to pack something. We already got supplies with barcodes on them. Why not hit two birds in one stone?
They hardly listen to us anyway, now we have another "scan" that needs to be done in the future. While we're focused on scanning everything we touch, we need to juggle packing and helping new people to deal with modernization like we do. Recipe for disaster, metric-wise.
I already know my store is going to crash this Q4 with SFS, because my ETLs/STL hardly listen and say SFS is easy. Apparently, we have the easiest job in the store. That couldn't be farther from the truth, because they can't handle modernization. 30 minute batches take up to 45 minutes-to-an-hour with how screwed up everything is currently.