- Joined
- Jul 16, 2011
- Messages
- 778
^^^^^ sounds like the srtl is just scared of the number seven!!!
know why?
cause 7 ate 9!!!!!!!!!!!!
know why?
cause 7 ate 9!!!!!!!!!!!!
So the beginning topic of this post was incorrect. Target is not cutting hours in Logistics... Currently a lot of Stores are giving hours from other workcenters to Logistics in an effort for the store to make payroll. Target is getting ready to have certain stores participate in a payroll test. These stores were chosen by the Group Leaders who know which stores in their groups are running effective Logistics processes. The details haven't been passed down yet but the idea is that these stores will track actual times that it takes to complete tasks and the company will reevaluate payroll allocations and RWT to reflect these findings. For example RWT gives too much time to work backroom batches and HBA repacks but too little time to Softlines and Cosmetics. They also realize that carton counts do not accurately reflect workloads as not all areas take the same amount of time. I'm not sure how this will turnout but the bottom line is that they most likely will allocate more payroll to logistics (maybe less to B/R day) and then can utilize the cashier and salefloor fill to need based on sales to accurately give stores the payroll they should be using.
I hope that transitions come into play as many months we miss payroll due to transitions for the next month and then the next month make the month by hundreds of hours. Knowing that freight does not arrive the day that it sells is part of the allocation issue.
They will probably reevaluate at the lowest of low volume stores that has the most stacked team in the country and take their best time on a good day and say "By gosh, we have actually been giving TOO MUCH payroll...cut cut cut!"
um who cares if they are lying, cheating, and stealing hours. That top 10 placement is all that matters, given your process is also GREEN!
Only cutting down on wasteful hours? This past SATURDAY, our A volume store closed with 1 person on the salesfloor, 1 person in softlines (who had to cover Starbucks, cashier, guest service, and GSTL breaks, so basically they weren't in softlines at all), one GSTL, 2 cashiers, 1 guest service, no electronics, and the LOD. It was hell.
Something smells fishy.
Must be that fish oil I've starting taking. It says that it's odorless and controls fish burps, but I'm not so sure about that...
But anyways, I agree, something is up. Every area of my store has been cut to the bone, but our leadership says we're devoting more hours to cashing (and that's why I'm only getting cashing shifts even though my primary workcenter was recently changed to Hardlines). 😕
Only cutting down on wasteful hours? This past SATURDAY, our A volume store closed with 1 person on the salesfloor, 1 person in softlines (who had to cover Starbucks, cashier, guest service, and GSTL breaks, so basically they weren't in softlines at all), one GSTL, 2 cashiers, 1 guest service, no electronics, and the LOD. It was hell.
This situation is actually what Target is trying to fix! A big majority of our stores reallocate hours to workcenters for their own specific needs... If your STL is logistics focused they may allocate more hours to the replenishment workcenters and steal from the salesfloor or front end! Others might go the other way... What Target is doing is making you schedule to the actual NEED of the trucks! If the truck calls for 110 hours and backroom needs 60 to finish backstock and autofills, that is what you are going to get from my understanding! You can't rob from peter to pay paul!
Only cutting down on wasteful hours? This past SATURDAY, our A volume store closed with 1 person on the salesfloor, 1 person in softlines (who had to cover Starbucks, cashier, guest service, and GSTL breaks, so basically they weren't in softlines at all), one GSTL, 2 cashiers, 1 guest service, no electronics, and the LOD. It was hell.
^^^^^THIS^^^^^ They will be taking it one step further though. Spot will also 1) cut hours and ask the team to have the same productivity with fewer overall hours (meaning you have to have a faster more efficient team) OR 2) extra tasks will be added to the logistic team work load. From what I am hearing (1) seems the most likely scenario. All I was saying is get ready, the winds of change are blowing. Keep in mind, when I say fewer hours, I'm not talking huge slashes. Look for 5-8% depending on the day of the week. Heck, on my stores team, if you cut out redundant smoke breaks that would make up the hours.....and that is exactly what spot is looking for. Efficiency, productivity, and accountability.
What really pisses me off the most is these new batch of leaders at my store. I am constantly having to either teach them how to do their jobs, doing their jobs, or forcing the other team members to do their jobs. One of them recently asked me how to print up substitution signs, out batches, and even the idiotic "How do I make a sign?".
We have a senior team lead who has trouble going from 7 to 8 while counting. Yes, you read that right, apparently the ability to get from 7 to 8 is no longer a requirement when they are looking for leadership. It took them three tries to get it done when counting team members. It was deadly quiet because we couldn't believe that this was happening.
But my favorite thing about this new batch of leadership has to be the disconnect from reality because they spend so little time on the floor. They told us we have to ask everybody if we can help them find something and then we have to call it over the walkie. Yeah, the problem with that is that there are only two members on the salesfloor and everybody else pretends to not have a walkie. So the electronics team member usually ends up doing all of hardlines while the fitting room operator does all of softlines. Now they are upset with us because our electronics score is in the red. Which of course leads them to berating us for doing what they told us to do. Whenever somebody calls out for help in electronics, it takes three calls to get a response on anything.