you solution is to set them up with an area that already done but you manually removed items or an aisle that has such a small amount of freight it will have no back stock. And then put x1 there. When x1 one claims it has backstock, know that said shelf location is empty enough to support it by verifying right then. If you can fit it, you win (ie you have caught them so you can do cca)
Otherwise your only solution is video. Don't forget you can get with etls and even Ap if it is obvious enough. You just need to back up your claim.
I learned that Flow TL got verbal coach from ETL log because he accused a TM of being way slow on a uboat of HBA. Problem is TM had finished his task already and was asked to do uboat with only "Its the last one off the truck, the backstock flat is already with 'Chemical TM' who was backstocking it. So he pushed Uboat until another TM who was also finished came over to help (because essentials must be done by 11am. Heh, that never happens). At that point, first TM told new TM he was going on break. He then explained that Boxes on floor were added. There was 3 boxes left to complete. So when those were done Uboat is worked and can be backstocked.
Here where everything went slanted. 'Chemical TM' has about 15 boxs on the floor nearby that looked worked. No one told First TM that those boxes weren't worked so he simply assumed they had been because thats how 'Chemical TM' works and First TM know this as does Flow TL. So when First TM returns to uboat Flow TL is there with New TM and is pissed saying that First TM lied to New TM about the fact Uboat was worked. Flow TL had worked several of floor boxes. He proceeds to verbally coach TM about this. First TM doesnt work with Flow TL and doesnt like his attitude so accuses him of being incompetent and lazy. Flow TL storms off to ETL log in br and First TM follows/
I am in discussion with ETL log about the new audits and Opal house , when the chaos appears. ETL listens to Flow TL reminds him about accuracy and other things from previous convo I wasnt privy too. First TM is silent Flow TL is still pissed and says that he is cca him anyway ETL frowns at him and then First TM gives his side.
This is when I discover story.
So how did I find out Flow TL was verbal coached? Apparently, ETL checked the camera saw First TM was right. As I am walking up to break I hear them in his office going over how you handle authority challenges and that while first TM shouldnt have said what he did, Flow tl failed in his duty to inform situation.
Thought I would share this nugget to help out. More often than not, I left things go that should be disciplined because I can't 100% prove it. ETL-log doesnt dislike Flow Tl or favor First TM. First TM is slow at times. This has alot to do with First TM's age and accommodation requirements. Flow TL knew this.
So know your TMs. Not just the ones you work with but the rest of the ones in LOG or SF or SL or GS etc.