For a year, they weren't allowed to get on a lane. Only recently has that changed.
This weekend, a GSA scheduled for a cashier shift sent the GS TM to a lane and she worked GS. Happens alot, particularly when certain GSAs are working.
For a year, they weren't allowed to get on a lane. Only recently has that changed.
Our GSTL’s will do this. If there are two of them you will see both of them chatting but not hoping on a lane.This! The GSAs at my store feel that they're above cashiering. They'll do anything but cashier even if they're scheduled a cashier shift.
This weekend, a GSA scheduled for a cashier shift sent the GS TM to a lane and she worked GS. Happens alot, particularly when certain GSAs are working.
in their defense, just because you're scheduled under the service desk workcenter doesn't mean that's where the business needs you right now
But that means that someone else is making the decision of what the business needs are and telling you where you are needed, not you looking at having a cashier shift and then deciding that the business doesn't need you there. Picking and choosing your own assignments is something for your convenience, not what is best for the store.in their defense, just because you're scheduled under the service desk workcenter doesn't mean that's where the business needs you right now. in any case, putting a GSA at the service desk means that the GSTL doesn't need to pay very much (if any) attention to it because the GSA can act as "the manager" and handle any overrides or other situations that would require GSTL intervention. i can't speak for your specific GSAs, and i'd personally prefer to cashier if i was scheduled to cashier (i kinda hate the service desk), but there is definitely a legitimate case to be made for what they did.
But that means that someone else is making the decision of what the business needs are and telling you where you are needed, not you looking at having a cashier shift and then deciding that the business doesn't need you there. Picking and choosing your own assignments is something for your convenience, not what is best for the store.
How more unilateral can you get than a GSA who has a cashier shift making the decision they are going to work GS instead that day and tell the person assigned to GS to be a cashier instead?i mean you’re just assuming that these are unilateral decisions
i mean you’re just assuming that these are unilateral decisions
What you said makes sense. However, my store has a few GSAs that find cashiering "beneath" them.
How more unilateral can you get than a GSA who has a cashier shift making the decision they are going to work GS instead that day and tell the person assigned to GS to be a cashier instead?
In my store they ARE when it comes to 2 specific GSA trained TMs.
I have to agree— someone with Supervisor numbers should have priority at the deskso they’re just making changes without checking with the GSTL or GSA on shift? i’d never let that happen on my shift but it i have another GSA with me i’m going to prefer to put them at service desk so i don’t need to worry about overrides or complicated guest situations over there.
But apparently whoever wrote the schedule had a different priority in mind.I have to agree— someone with Supervisor numbers should have priority at the desk
The HR TM writes our front end schedule. Their priority is scheduling the bare minimum coverage.But apparently whoever wrote the schedule had a different priority in mind.
But apparently whoever wrote the schedule had a different priority in mind.
But apparently whoever wrote the schedule had a different priority in mind.
This. If target is serious about eliminating SD and cashier positions, they NEED to have better training systems in place. Honestly, if I were them, I would’ve waited until New POS is out to do this.The front end works well when you can move people around.
I worked all week at GS and only once did I require an override due to a price match being too high.I have to agree— someone with Supervisor numbers should have priority at the desk
But the complaint wasn't that a GSTL switched things around, it was that a GSA scheduled for a cashier shift took it upon themselves to change their own duty assignment. Apples and oranges.Yeah can't say this is true. That level of thought most likely wasn't put into it.
The front end works well when you can move people around. If switching a GSA and a guest service TM is going to work best, you better believe I'm going to make that switch.
We have one GSA who flatly said, no cashier shifts or I quit. I personally don't care. My preference is to have variety, and the new model provides that.But the complaint wasn't that a GSTL switched things around, it was that a GSA scheduled for a cashier shift took it upon themselves to change their own duty assignment. Apples and oranges.
I have to agree— someone with Supervisor numbers should have priority at the desk
If GSTMs are getting snippy w guests they shouldn’t be GSTMs then lol. It’s our job to be happy and smiling even when we want to kill the person in front of usNot just supervisor numbers...there are some service desk TMs who can get really snippy with guests, and it usually ends up being the GSAs that fix the problem with an upset guest. (And they're a lot nicer about it...) We had one TM chewing out a guest over an order pickup back in Q4, and all we needed to know was how to cancel the order. GSA comes over and boom, fixed. So I'm okay with them at the desk at my current store.
If GSTMs are getting snippy w guests they shouldn’t be GSTMs then lol. It’s our job to be happy and smiling even when we want to kill the person in front of us