Tessa120
Current game: Elex
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2017
- Messages
- 6,074
But fair is fair. How can you look at customer A and tell that person that you are waiving policy but then look at the very next customer who wants to do the same thing and say nope, policy stands?
How can you say that being fair is arbitrary treatment that is weighted and therefore unfair?
What criteria are you using, both the criteria you admit to yourself and the criteria of "something makes me not like this person" or "this person is a longtime friend I just met today"?
Fair is fair, and that's why rules are rules. To protect the company from bias complaints, to protect the company from people like you making biased decisions, to protect the company from other guests seeing your preferential treatment and realizing they will be treated worse than other customers and going where they won't be treated worse.
It seems odd you would say that alienating a good customer is bad when you are willing to alienate 5 good customers because they don't get the special exceptions, they have to stick with the standard policy and develop heartburn as they watch someone get an override.
And Mom thinking a game is too mature for her kid is always a super dumb reason. If she bought it in a brain dead moment then her stupidity is not worth losing money. Caveat Emptor.
And of course someone will cry "someone else snuck it in the home." If it was someone else then why did she let the shrink wrap be opened before checking it out?
And even if Mommy instinct is to let a kid play an unknown game without researching first and then clutch pearls when she sees what's on the screen, she's not out of money, so why try and game the system instead of tossing in the trash?
How can you say that being fair is arbitrary treatment that is weighted and therefore unfair?
What criteria are you using, both the criteria you admit to yourself and the criteria of "something makes me not like this person" or "this person is a longtime friend I just met today"?
Fair is fair, and that's why rules are rules. To protect the company from bias complaints, to protect the company from people like you making biased decisions, to protect the company from other guests seeing your preferential treatment and realizing they will be treated worse than other customers and going where they won't be treated worse.
It seems odd you would say that alienating a good customer is bad when you are willing to alienate 5 good customers because they don't get the special exceptions, they have to stick with the standard policy and develop heartburn as they watch someone get an override.
And Mom thinking a game is too mature for her kid is always a super dumb reason. If she bought it in a brain dead moment then her stupidity is not worth losing money. Caveat Emptor.
And of course someone will cry "someone else snuck it in the home." If it was someone else then why did she let the shrink wrap be opened before checking it out?
And even if Mommy instinct is to let a kid play an unknown game without researching first and then clutch pearls when she sees what's on the screen, she's not out of money, so why try and game the system instead of tossing in the trash?