redeye58
Hasta Ba Rista, Baby!
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2011
- Messages
- 21,416
Also mannequins should be tied as well,
An image of a tied-up mannequin just popped into my head....
Sorry, carry on.
Also mannequins should be tied as well,
IlyAn image of a tied-up mannequin just popped into my head....
Sorry, carry on.
98 is the area above a rack. So much for not confusing the team.VML training states you store tie to secction 98 to not disrupt sidecaps or confuse the team. Also mannequins should be tied as well, I go the extra mile and tie the hurdles so you can scan them and tell what doesnt go.
For the rest of the year, every store was allocated a certain amount of payroll for the VMTL every week that is outside of it's yearly payroll financials. What people are worried about though is that next year, when AE2016 rolls out, how the VMTL position will affect headcount and payroll. There are certain work centers that are just "given" payroll, regardless of sales or trends. AP, PMT, and I *think* HR. Though I think that changed when most stores got rid of the HR-TL. VM, being a sales-based work center, will most likely be based on sales. So the across-the-board allocation system won't be in place next year. Your work centers payroll will be based on sales.
AND, with the way Target is trying to push for "salesfloor" coverage rather than "Hardlines vs Softlines vs Market vs VM", you and your team members will probably count against what Target insists is proper salesfloor coverage. That means you and your team members will be expected to cover front lanes, make sure CAFs are pushed, make sure breaks are covered, etc.
But what it boils down to is that team leads eat up payroll. And it severely affects their work center...typically making their job harder. You'll probably be in charge of all brand team members. Right now, you're just being scheduled, and your brand team members are being scheduled, and you're expected to do your thing. Next year though, your work centers hours will probably fluctuate based on sales. One week you might have 100 hours of payroll(Where you eat up 40, your brand team members get the other 60), and another week you get 60(where you get 40 and your brand team members get 20). It's stressful. Instead of being a TEAM leader, you become the sole team member of your department. Expect this between January and September. And every other sales based department is being ran the same way. You get to a point to where ONLY team leads are scheduled on the floor. So you *have* to respond to back up. You *have* to push out those CAFs. You *have* to take care of that reshop.
This is how Target has ran every new department it's rolled out. Eventually you'll just be a replacement for your team members, rather than an asset.
If you store tie, you have to break the current planogram tie. That isn't practical.
(just cracked myself up when I reread this...."practical" hahahahahaha)
Did you mean me?God people are fucking stupid.
Did you mean me?
It happens with the myDevice. Of course, the choice should be to not untie the pog, but a tm that doesn't know better and was told to store tie something will probably just do it because that's what they were told to do. We are now using a unique section number.Who ever told you that. Cause we have the same problem, or they break the pog to store tie one flex item, breaking the entire isle.
Yeah, I've already realized that I have no team whatsoever. Its a lonely position. I feel isolated from the other teams and nobody is really sure what the hell I do all day. It's upsetting to me, plus there really isn't any daily/weekly guidance from the etls as to what they expect me to work on, I'm kind of left to do my "thing".For the rest of the year, every store was allocated a certain amount of payroll for the VMTL every week that is outside of it's yearly payroll financials. What people are worried about though is that next year, when AE2016 rolls out, how the VMTL position will affect headcount and payroll. There are certain work centers that are just "given" payroll, regardless of sales or trends. AP, PMT, and I *think* HR. Though I think that changed when most stores got rid of the HR-TL. VM, being a sales-based work center, will most likely be based on sales. So the across-the-board allocation system won't be in place next year. Your work centers payroll will be based on sales.
AND, with the way Target is trying to push for "salesfloor" coverage rather than "Hardlines vs Softlines vs Market vs VM", you and your team members will probably count against what Target insists is proper salesfloor coverage. That means you and your team members will be expected to cover front lanes, make sure CAFs are pushed, make sure breaks are covered, etc.
But what it boils down to is that team leads eat up payroll. And it severely affects their work center...typically making their job harder. You'll probably be in charge of all brand team members. Right now, you're just being scheduled, and your brand team members are being scheduled, and you're expected to do your thing. Next year though, your work centers hours will probably fluctuate based on sales. One week you might have 100 hours of payroll(Where you eat up 40, your brand team members get the other 60), and another week you get 60(where you get 40 and your brand team members get 20). It's stressful. Instead of being a TEAM leader, you become the sole team member of your department. Expect this between January and September. And every other sales based department is being ran the same way. You get to a point to where ONLY team leads are scheduled on the floor. So you *have* to respond to back up. You *have* to push out those CAFs. You *have* to take care of that reshop.
This is how Target has ran every new department it's rolled out. Eventually you'll just be a replacement for your team members, rather than an asset.
Are you sure? Most corporations don't work that way, they "invest" in creating a new position and take that as a new "loss" for the company that will be made up for down the road once that person's contributions really start to come into play and boost profits. I mean look at it, just as the cost of living rises each year so does the expenditure that it takes to run a company. I'm not sure about this robbing peter to pay paul theory people are describing, of course target is going to increase spending when they are developing a new department, doesn't mean that they are cutting someone else's.Target doesn't create more payroll. If they are giving more payroll to department A, that means they have pulled it from department B. And the department that gets the hours has to help make up the lack of team members in the other department (most of the time). You will see this more after the holidays.
Thats interesting to say, why do you think that about the position, I'm a vml and would be interested to know...plus I'm new to retail and target so not quite sure how it would be political in my case.Completely political and ephemeral position.
Most corporations don't work that way, they "invest" in creating a new position and take that as a new "loss" for the company that will be made up for down the road once that person's contributions really start to come into play and boost profits.
That's the one I was going to mention right now! It's on the way out as we speak.Oh, In-Stocks. Another position I forgot that doesn't really exist anymore.
CTL position still exists. But it may be similar to Food Ave in that lower volume stores don't get one. I know that is the case for a few ulvs around me.This is the first time Target has created a position in years. The last batch was the PFRESH roll out about...5 years ago. Since then the CTL and the Food Business Partner positions have been eliminated.
What will most likely happen is that the new VMTL and related positions are going to be used to change the culture and best practices of the company. Once solid routines are in place, the experts will not be needed and the positions will be folded into the rest of the "core" positions. This has happened EVERY time. Replenishment, recovery, price change, food, operations. These were all leader positions that no longer exist.
The VML position was a "reflexive" move. Target saw a problem, and responded to it. Once the problem is gone, the VML won't be needed. Sorry, but that's just the history of the company.
Are you sure? Most corporations don't work that way, they "invest" in creating a new position and take that as a new "loss" for the company that will be made up for down the road once that person's contributions really start to come into play and boost profits. I mean look at it, just as the cost of living rises each year so does the expenditure that it takes to run a company. I'm not sure about this robbing peter to pay paul theory people are describing, of course target is going to increase spending when they are developing a new department, doesn't mean that they are cutting someone else's.
BITTERThere is all kinds of sales numbers but to look at it in the minuscule detail you would have to be given more depth compared to what is already available. You can look at each department number for example: you could see that sales for girls pants/shorts 205 is up x% and you made $xxx.xxxxxxxxx amount for the week/month/year compared to last year. But to further break it down you'd have to know what sells for Target well and that's what these know it alls they are bringing in from outside won't know as these number only give you a generic idea what sells.
Endcaps are handled corporate side so unless you are figuring out numbers to see what would make the most sense for your specific store for a blown endcap then yes that would make sense otherwise the VML is a glorified overpaid team leader with a slightly more visual approach.
VML's were hired for an outside view/vision. And depending on the experience determines the pay scale. VML's are highly skilled in what they do. They have years of experience. There are reasons internals were passed over. You need to take that up with your ESTL. And FYI, not all of them have a degree. It's call years of on the job training, which equals, the same. They deserve respect, And they are respecting you the same. But, in some cases, not getting it in return. Which is unfortunate, because Target is supposed to be about TEAM WORK.
Basically, robbing Peter to pay Paul('s workcenter).