Again, on paper it looks good. But, first, as
@SFSFun posted, capacities have to be accurate from the start. That means HQ has to set accurate capacities correctly, with the store only adjusting for special or unique circumstsnces such as a support pole going through the shelves. Stores don't have the hours to check and adjust every location in the store.
Also, the triggers actually have to work in the system. While doing research I will find OUT locations with no past activity, meaning there are no on-hands, no last research, no last pull, no last sold date, and zero on the way. These are active items, not discontinued, not clearance. The system should have ordered it when it hit zero, or, made it a RIG. But, neither happened and that product was out of stock for who knows how long until it was researched.
These are just two areas in the stores that need to be spot on. How many exist all along the distribution chain?
I'm not questioning the efficiency of the End to End process. I'm questioning HQ's commitment to properly executing it. And, I'm not talking about supplying the correct number of racks needed, I'm talking about investing in enough competent and committed personnel to pull it off.
Target Canada, on paper, looked like a good idea. But, it was the execution at a number of levels that doomed it.