We are required to do RIGs and have the task list completed by 11. They need to be pulled and worked before 1. RIGs serve a purpose as they confirm counts when there are discrepancies, check drastic counts, check inventory before the ad changes on Sunday. RIGs help to identify areas with POG, salesplan, revision, stocking problems. They help the company to identify items that are a problem for more than just one store. I think some RIGs are ridiculous... all of the pFresh should be removed as those items are ordered, QMosed, etc. I also think that when we identify problem areas (checklane fills, ties, labels not changed during revisions, incorrect capacity, continual overstocking) that they should be addressed by the appropriate team. We write down the same "issues" every week. I've been doing this for a long time. I have a notebook and it's funny/not funny that I have some of the exact same things written down 5 years ago as I wrote down last week. We could get more RSCH done, but may miss those items that actually are important. It would be interesting to see what would happen if we didn't have to do them. We used to check future ad items by researching the store specific ad guide the week before. That actually worked to have our floor filled for the ad.
Or having 500 packs of clorox wipes, because someone backstocked them incorrectly.This!
Also without doing the Rigs problems that are small and are corrected on the spot will grow and you really won't like having say pallets of paper towels when you don't need them. Or not having any when the system says you have 300 of them cause a mis-pick didn't get caught.
Sure, if you scan the whole store every single day. Seriously, though... there are oftentimes RIGs that don't match schematics (identifying POG set/revision issues), there may be missing labels that are caught during RIGs (and product is in the back room) and other things that scanning alone just can't catch.All of this could be caught & corrected with good standalone RSCH routines though right? I'm just not sure I see the benefit.
The point is to catch smaller things that you might not otherwise notice. Things like mispicks, items stocked in the wrong place, FF orders that are INF'd.All of this could be caught & corrected with good standalone RSCH routines though right? I'm just not sure I see the benefit.
All of this could be caught & corrected with good standalone RSCH routines though right? I'm just not sure I see the benefit.
TLs, ETLs, and the STL will do POG fills, but the STL will also have me do stand alone research everyday in areas he or I think need it. Stand alone research fills the floor more accurately than the POG fills. That is, if you have a good and reliable TM doing the research.We are not allowed to do stand alone research now. Just shoot pog fills and call it a day. Doesn't fix anything but the floor is full of mistakes since they pick some of the worst people to push them and when the facings are full just flex it to fill the entire shelf.
But if you can get into a rhythm of dropping pog fills and researching after its even more accurate and fills more.TLs, ETLs, and the STL will do POG fills, but the STL will also have me do stand alone research everyday in areas he or I think need it. Stand alone research fills the floor more accurately than the POG fills. That is, if you have a good and reliable TM doing the research.
Not when the Instocks team is one person and your Flow team can't push to the piece to save their lives. Too much of my time is spent fixing overstocking and product pushed to the wrong location. I actually show it to the Flow TL and ETL but it is never investigated to find out who does it so no coaching or corrective action is ever done.But if you can get into a rhythm of dropping pog fills and researching after its even more accurate and fills more.
Not when the Instocks team is one person and your Flow team can't push to the piece to save their lives. Too much of my time is spent fixing overstocking and product pushed to the wrong location. I actually show it to the Flow TL and ETL but it is never investigated to find out who does it so no coaching or corrective action is ever done.
TLs, ETLs, and the STL will do POG fills, but the STL will also have me do stand alone research everyday in areas he or I think need it. Stand alone research fills the floor more accurately than the POG fills. That is, if you have a good and reliable TM doing the research.
Mine takes maybe 45 minutes, usually less. We average around 130-150 rigs, and a lot of the time we run into errors from pog or backroom errors that screw up counts. So it'll take us 45 minutes or so.Your store's RIGs take three hours?
Your store's RIGs take three hours?
Not when the Instocks team is one person and your Flow team can't push to the piece to save their lives. Too much of my time is spent fixing overstocking and product pushed to the wrong location. I actually show it to the Flow TL and ETL but it is never investigated to find out who does it so no coaching or corrective action is ever done.
How many people work 150 RIGs in 45min?Mine takes maybe 45 minutes, usually less. We average around 130-150 rigs, and a lot of the time we run into errors from pog or backroom errors that screw up counts. So it'll take us 45 minutes or so.
I used to do that and pull multiple carts of backstock off the shelves every day. Was told it'd get looked into and nothing ever happened so I just stopped caring...sadly.
How many people work 150 RIGs in 45min?
Even funnier when it was the etl-log who did it. Bacrom detail reports are your freinds.Or having 500 packs of clorox wipes, because someone backstocked them incorrectly.
Just myself.How many people work 150 RIGs in 45min?
Yes, I know because when I did pets, I corrected a lot of discrepancies as I did the rigs and it fixed the problem. Rigs are a sign of how much issues you have with BRAll of this could be caught & corrected with good standalone RSCH routines though right? I'm just not sure I see the benefit.