Did some digging, did some question asking with leaders who don’t BS me; they’re still waiting on the info. I personally verified that the pay chart (for my store at least, every store has their own) has not yet updated. Of note, on workbench the page with all the paycharts instead of saying ‘last updated’ on the top, said ‘being updated by:’ and someone was editing it.
Having said that, I have more info that can help lead us to make more educated predictions.
The start rate for each paygrade is based on your stores pay ‘structure’, which determines the difference between paygrades. There’s 4 structures, A B C and D. A is base pay all around, currently $(base) for TMs, +$4 for PG40, +$5.75 for PG45. B is +$4.50 for PG40, +$6.50 for PG45. C is +$4.75 for PG40, +$7.50 for PG45. D is +$5.25 for PG40, +$8 for PG45.
The question now is how the reduction in number of paygrades will flatten this all out. The optimistic guess is that those differentials will stay the same, and all leaders will benefit from now being PG45 and receive the higher pay. The pessimistic guess is they will adjust downward $0.50, since they are based on difference from PG30, which won’t exist. The super pessimistic guess is that the new differential between the two paygrades would be the PG40 one minus $0.50 but that would almost certainly result in an unacceptable amount of leadership turnover.
With PG40 people, it’s still to be determined but I would be shocked if the 40s weren’t all bumped to their structure’s PG45 base pay. I don’t even think the system will allow someone to be paid lower than the minimum for the role they are keyed in for. So when mytime is back, everyone will be keyed in under the new roles and job codes and paygrades (in addition to all set scheduled being deleted RIP HR teams).
Keep in mind when dealing with your ETLs/HR/STL that they are also impatiently awaiting all of this info, they’ve got all of us breathing down their necks about it, they’re worried about potential turnover as a result, etc etc.